Sunshine, daisies, butter mellow. Turn this stupid fat rat, yellow.


July 2016

Delicious, delicious.

Heston Blumenthal. My favourite, favourite chef. Every nook and cranny of his dishes have twists. His cooking is more like experimenting. He could probably name his restaurant “The Chemist” or hey, hey, he could be Papa Smurf!

So what makes me write about this now? Well the reason is very delicious! His world famous Chocolate Mousse – thanks to Master Chef Australia!

You know how chocolate and water are never to be mixed? But this is Heston we are talking about. So what does Heston do? Heston mixes chocolate and water! 

Ya, like he is going to do something conventional!

All you need:

350 gms of (good quality)  C7H8N4O2, translation: Chocolate  (dark or otherwise).

425 mls of water – hot, hot H2O, translation: Water.

All you have to do is take the chocolate in a bowl and add the hot water and keep whisking continuously. You will observe here, that the chocolate starts to thicken up and if you know mousse, you know when to stop whisking. If you over whisk it, its really okay, you can melt it back and repeat the process..

Heston also says, if u find the mousse bitter sprinkle some salt on it. 

In fact, if anything is too bitter for your taste, add salt, not sugar.

#hestonblumenthal #inspired #foodie #fortheloveoffood


Yajnaseni : Draupadi’s POV of The Mahabharata

Bedtime stories – that’s how the obsession with the great epic started for me. Thanks to my Grandmother. It actually has a steady grip on me. I started my mythology spree with the very recent Jaya by Devdutt Pattanaik. And then it just kept continuing. As I read Jaya, when in the end Yudhishtira doesn’t even turn once to look his people as he ascended the mountain to reach swarga, I sat there with the book in my hand wondering what on earth did he do that for? From there my quiver of questions wanted to be shot (all at once at that). Questions like The kings had a lot of wives. Why was it that only Draupadi was chosen to be wedded by all? kept me from peace and dear old sleep. Then there came Ajaya I and II by Anand Neelakantan. That was like a boon to my mind. That for me was “perspective”. I mean the story was the same but it justified the actions Kauravas (without the story being changed. I’m not saying there was no tweaking. But it was just tweaking and not twisting). I mean, come on I have always been told how only the Pandavas were righteous and I (being the rebel that I am) have always questioned that. And now, Yejnaseni. I am done 3/4s of the book and I have a lot of questions.

What I have always been exposed to until I read Ajaya was how good the Pandavas were. To put it right, what I have always been exposed to until I read Ajaya was how only the Pandavas were good. I mean come on, you know how there is always two sides to a coin, the Pandavas would have had their set of shortcomings. Speaking of which, the Kauravas would have had their baggage of righteousness. Correct me if I am wrong there. I am so attached to all of these characters.. Especially, Karna. And all those characters who were affected by hierarchy.

Prathibha Ray justifies Guru Drona’s demand of Eklavya as so: for the fear of the Kauravas being exterminated by Eklavya, his thumb became gurudhakshina. Now, that isn’t fair is it? Guru Drona had given his word to Arjuna about making him the world’s most accomplished archer. That was the real reason for his demand.

I know it is an age old story and we have no way of finding something called “fact”. I am so attached to all of these characters and all I am doing is stand up for people like Karna and Eklavya and the many others who had suffered in the stampede of hierarchy.

This book tells me that the Pandavas did not gauge a person by the scale of caste which is why Draupadi serves the Kiratas (Eklavya’s caste) food cooked in the akshayapatra and that the Pandavas and the Kiratas had food together and that Arjun would remove the all the used plantain leaves.  I’d like answers for two questions in this scenario,

  1. Then why was caste always in Karna’s way? If you don’t stop injustice, it just means you support injustice. Why didn’t the Pandavas stand up for Karna like Suyodhana did during the display of prowess of Guru Drona’s disciples?
  2. Do you really think the priests like Dhaumya (who was always with them) would have been in a 100kms radius of the Pandavas if they didn’t mind of caste?

Another scenario in this book that grossed me out is this:

Obeying Kunti, (and at Yudhishtira’s insistence of securing unity amongst the brothers) Panchali had to marry the pancha Pandavas. I’d made peace with her fate and kept reading until, each and every husband of her’s except Arjuna tells her that even when she was only Arjuna’s betrothed they had all secretly desired her. How can one secretly desire one’s own brother’s betrothed and under pretences of obedience accomplish said marriage (in this case, marriages?)

This rendition makes my heart heavy because I feel the author hasn’t been fair with her characters. Tweaking happens in all renditions and it is done for the story’s sake. But here, it has been tampered with for a reason and it is, in my opinion only to justify the Pandavas’ actions.

This book was said to be Draupadi’s point of view of the Mahabharata. But this book is a justification for all the Pandavas’ actions.

Not just the writer (not sure about the original author but the writers of the renditions) but most of us are partial. The Kauravas were worthy warriors. The Pandavas broke most of the rules of war. Karna’s death. Dear old pitamaha Bhishma’s death. Guru Drona’s death. Everything they achieved was by foul-play. Where was all their valour? Where was their greatness? Where was their prowess in war-craft? 

And when once in a while someone raises a question, “In order to restore dharma, sometimes, adharma is the only way.” is the answer readily thrown at said someone! The question “So what is the difference between you and the person you are trying to stop following adharma?” remains because it is just too inconvenient.




Both worlds?

So I was thinking..

Hermione Granger, connected to both worlds. Does she use Google (of course when she isn’t at Hogwarts) to look stuff up?

She reads a lot. Does she keep track of all her books on GoodReads?

Does she promote S.P.E.W on Twitter?

May be Arthur Weasley got interested in the computer (the copmuter) and the Internet (the inerten) and has his daughter-in-law helping him out on how to use them? (Of course Molly would breath fire if she knew what they were up to).

A Website.

Up ↑

The Local Tea Party

Sunshine, daisies, butter mellow. Turn this stupid fat rat, yellow.


I'm a Gynecologist by profession but an artist at heart. Forever trying to bridge the gap between Art and Science. I love good design, good food and open minds. I hope you enjoy my blog.

The Mind Travelogues

Let the thoughts roam free!

The Girl Next Door

Food, travel and life stories...

The snide aside

Sometimes a tongue-in-cheek and at other times a foot-in-mouth. Life reviewed!

The Review Lounge

Books. Movies. Honesty.

Wordly Pleasures

The colors of life, death, wind, energy, everything.

Life As Najida

Sharing the things I love to do

The Daily Post

The Art and Craft of Blogging


memories and musings



Thought Process

Little pulses of activity in the CPU of a thoughtprocessor. Batteries not included.

The Tears of a Clown

Now if there's a smile upon my face...

unbolt me

the literary asylum

Darkland Poetry

Writings from Rachel Firmin

%d bloggers like this: